|
Brooklyn Tornado, September 16, 2010
Philip
Lutzak – September 2010
|
Intro
Just three
years after an EF2 tornado roared through western Brooklyn, NY,
another tornado hit the borough, only two
miles north of where the 2007 event occurred. Although this one was
weaker, rated an EF0 on the
Enhanced Fujita
Scale, it damaged many homes and businesses, severely
disrupting life there yet again. This tornado was caused by
a severe thunderstorm embedded in an intense squall line that also produced an EF1 tornado and a
macroburst that killed one person in neighboring Queens, NY. Figure 1
at right shows a still image taken from a
video of the thunderstorm over Red Hook, Brooklyn. This is the
intensifying
thunderstorm that eventually produced the tornado over Brooklyn.
About 5 minutes before the tornado reached Park Slope, the lower sky
developed the classic green color that many people who have seen a
tornado speak about. This is the rain shaft of the
thunderstorm - NOT the tornado. The line of grey clouds ahead of the
rain shaft is the front of the thunderstorm outflow. In this brief
report we'll look at how the National Weather Service determines where the
severe weather occurred and what kind of weather feature caused it. Below in Figures 2 a and b are pictures of the damage in
Park Slope, Brooklyn. As a caution, if the information here gets too
technical for you, please just go to the last paragraph - it sums up the
words Brooklyn and Tornado.
|
|
 |
|
Figure 1. Severe thunderstorm moving into Red Hook, Brooklyn. Note
that this is NOT the tornado; the area of green color is the heavy
rain shaft. Shortly after this, it produced a tornado over Park Slope
Brooklyn.
2010-09-16. Courtesy
Januszwelin. |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
Figure 2a. Car crushed by uprooted tree, Park Slope, Brooklyn.
2010-09-16. Courtesy
Chris Scalici. |
|
Figure 2b. Tree snapped at middle of trunk, Park Slope, Brooklyn.
2010-09-16. Courtesy
Chris Scalici. |
|
|
|
Evidence in the damage
The way the
damaged trees and debris fall helps storm investigators from the National
Weather Service to determine if it was caused by a tornado or straight-line
winds. In Figure 3,
each red
arrow shows the direction that the debris was blown based on physical
examination of the area (see photographs.) Since the debris from the storm
was distributed in a circular, counter-clockwise pattern in Park Slope, it
provides strong evidence that a tornado passed over the area (graphic
example.) |
 |
|
Figure 3. Aerial view of Park Slope, Brooklyn.
White arrows show where pictures at right were taken. Red
arrows show the wind direction based on how the debris was blown. It
can be seen from these red arrows that winds blew in a
counter-clockwise direction, adding proof of a tornado. Courtesy
Google
Maps and
Chris Scalici. |
|
Location and intensity Figure
4a below left shows the location and tracks of the three separate
severe weather events that occurred. An EF0 tornado with winds of
about 85 mph touched down in Park Slope at 5:33PM around 4th avenue
and 9th street and continued east-northeast for 2 miles towards
eastern Brooklyn. Shortly after this
a strong macroburst began occurring over eastern Brooklyn and west central Queens and moved
eastward for 8 miles into central Queens. (Macrobursts and microbursts
are strong downdrafts of winds in thunderstorms that blow outward
from the storm in straight lines; their winds can reach speeds well over 100
mph. Microbursts are less than 2.5 miles across and last less than 5
minutes. The larger macrobursts cover more than 2.5 miles and last
from 5 to 20 minutes. Here is a great
case study of a microburst.) The NWS estimated that the winds in this
macroburst reached 125 mph. Shortly after the macroburst was
inflicting heavy damage on central Queens, an EF1 tornado with 100 mph
winds developed 2 miles south of Flushing, Queens, just to the
northeast of the macroburst, and moved northeastward until
it dissipated over Great Neck Bay. Tornado warnings were issued by the
National Weather Service local office at
5:24PM and
5:36PM.
Close to 3,000
trees were felled or severely damaged during this event. Figure 4b shows
all of the locations where damaged tree reports were received, making
it a very good proxy for the storm path. Park Slope, Bushwick, and
Middle Village were especially hard hit. |
 |
|
Figure 4a. Satellite image of New York City showing the damage
paths of the two tornadoes and microburst. Courtesy
Google Maps. |
|
|
 |
|
Figure 4b. Map of all damaged tree reports received by NYC's 311
problem line. Courtesy
New York Times. |
|
|
Causes
Damaging downdrafts and microbursts in thunderstorms
are often associated with "bow echoes." Figure 5 at right is an
illustration of radar echoes showing how a thunderstorm in a
squall line can develop into a bow echo. If
the thunderstorm's steering winds begin to concentrate at its center/rear,
the storm gets stretched forward into a bow shape. The leading edge of
this arc can produce very high winds such as a micro- or macroburst. In addition, the northern end of the bow
sometimes curves backward and forms a
small vortex, called a comma head or comma echo, which in turn may develop
into a tornado. Since a
similar vortex can also spin up at the bottom of the bow echo, resulting in two
vortices on either end of the bow, they are also called "bookend vortices."
Radar images from this NYC event (Figure 6 below) closely match the illustration in Figure 5 at right. It appears that a bow echo with a comma head/bookend vortex
first started forming just southwest of Park Slope (Figure 6a) around
5:30PM. As these features continued east-northeastward, the comma head
developed into the EF0 tornado in Park Slope. As this tornado dissipated the bow echo continued to strengthen rapidly
(Figure 6b),
producing the 125 mph macroburst at 5:40PM over eastern Brooklyn and central
Queens and the EF1 tornado at 5:44PM over north central Queens (Figure 6c.)
Examining the location and times between the Brooklyn and Queens tornadoes,
it seems quite possible that both were produced by the same bookend vortex
at the northern end of the bow echo. Here's an excellent, more detailed
explanation of
bow echo dynamics. |
|
 |
|
Figure 5. Illustration of radar returns showing the evolution of a
thunderstorm into a classic bow echo. Courtesy
UCAR COMET. |
|
This short examination
of the severe weather event of September 16th in New York City, with a
concentration on the tornado in Brooklyn, is intended to provide some
initial assessment of the damage that was caused and the meteorological
reasons for why it occurred. A lot more investigation needs to be done.
The Last Word
This short video of the
tornado in Brooklyn was
taken by two young Brooklynites in eastern Brooklyn near the Queens border. I consider it very important in that it looks like they
not only experienced the end of the first tornado but also the fury of the
developing macroburst. Watch when they say that "it's funneling" and
then it's followed by even higher winds. It certainly looks like they
experienced most if not all of the macroburst which eventually reached 125
mph. In addition it is
also very entertaining, but be warned:
they did some things you are not supposed to do during a tornado warning,
and they use very intense "Brooklyn" language (in California
accents (!) of all things.) But the intense winds at the end make this well worth
watching,
and at least they ran when the tree started to disintegrate.
|